Ecuadorian vs Bermudan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Bermudan
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ecuadorians
Bermudans
18.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Bermudan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,275,748 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,609,827 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 18.1%, a difference of 3.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | Bermudan |
Minimum | 1.9% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 46.8% | 38.3% |
Range | 44.9% | 35.9% |
Mean | 18.9% | 16.2% |
Median | 17.3% | 16.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.5% | 22.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.1% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Bermudans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (18.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cuba (18.8%, a difference of 0.28%), American (18.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Nigerian (18.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and Marshallese (18.7%, a difference of 0.90%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Immigrants from Africa (18.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Nicaraguan (18.2%, a difference of 0.42%), Nonimmigrants (18.3%, a difference of 0.94%), Alaskan Athabascan (18.3%, a difference of 0.97%), and Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |