Eastern European vs Immigrants from Oceania Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Eastern European
Immigrants from Oceania
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Eastern Europeans
Immigrants from Oceania
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
74.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Eastern European vs Immigrants from Oceania Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,870,617 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.672 and weighted average of 19.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,448,754 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 20.7%, a difference of 8.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Eastern European | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 4.0% | 5.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 62.5% |
Range | 96.0% | 56.9% |
Mean | 25.3% | 27.0% |
Median | 17.2% | 21.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.9% | 19.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.1% | 37.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.2% | 18.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.6% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.3% | 12.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Eastern Europeans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Eastern Europeans are Immigrants from Fiji (19.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Vietnam (19.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (19.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Argentinean (19.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |