Czech vs Tongan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Czech
Tongan
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Czechs
Tongans
14.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Tongan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,185,036 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.003 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,473,172 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 4.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Tongan |
| Minimum | 0.95% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 36.4% | 29.2% |
| Range | 35.4% | 26.5% |
| Mean | 14.7% | 12.8% |
| Median | 13.5% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.5% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Tongans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (14.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Greece (14.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Asia (14.1%, a difference of 0.58%), and Korean (14.1%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.79%), Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.91%), Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.95%), and Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.99%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |