Czech vs Thai Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
COMPARE
Czech
Thai
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Comparison
Czechs
Thais
10.5%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Thai Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,172,256 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.307 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 468,192,905 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.146 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 3.6%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Thai |
Minimum | 3.7% | 0.92% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 19.7% |
Range | 63.0% | 18.8% |
Mean | 15.5% | 9.7% |
Median | 12.3% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.9% | 11.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.5% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Thais by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Slovene (10.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Bhutanese (10.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Lithuanian (10.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Polish (10.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and Menominee (10.6%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Czechoslovakian (10.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Finnish (10.8%, a difference of 0.84%), Latvian (10.8%, a difference of 0.98%), Scotch-Irish (10.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and Luxembourger (10.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Poles | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Irish | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Swiss | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Marshallese | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
British | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Luxembourgers | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Latvians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Finns | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.4 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Thais | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |