Czech vs Immigrants from Europe Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Czech
Immigrants from Europe
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Czechs
Immigrants from Europe
9.0%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Immigrants from Europe Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,004,633 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 543,216,958 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.748 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 17.2%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Immigrants from Europe |
Minimum | 2.2% | 3.2% |
Maximum | 42.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 40.1% | 96.8% |
Mean | 10.8% | 18.5% |
Median | 8.9% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 15.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 22.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 21.8% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are German (9.0%, a difference of 0.53%), English (9.1%, a difference of 0.67%), Lithuanian (9.1%, a difference of 0.77%), Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and Scandinavian (9.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.0% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Poles | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Europe by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Europe are Immigrants from Kenya (10.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Osage (10.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Portuguese (10.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Latvia (10.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Australia (10.5%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Sierra Leoneans | 86.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Norway | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 86.4 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 85.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 84.7 /100 | #138 | Excellent 10.5% |
Portuguese | 84.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 83.4 /100 | #140 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Europe | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 10.5% |
Osage | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Asia | 80.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.6% |
Iraqis | 80.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.6% |
Laotians | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 10.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Greece | 79.0 /100 | #147 | Good 10.6% |
Americans | 78.1 /100 | #148 | Good 10.6% |