Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Croatia Family Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Immigrants from Croatia
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Immigrants from Croatia
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Croatia Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,669,162 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,458,844 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.055 and weighted average of 7.8%, a difference of 1.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Croatia |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 23.0% | 18.7% |
| Range | 21.9% | 17.0% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 6.8% |
| Median | 7.6% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Immigrants from Croatia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Italy (8.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Denmark (8.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from England (8.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and Serbian (8.0%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Croatia are Immigrants from China (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Austrian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Latvia (7.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Ukrainian (7.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from North America (7.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Austrians | 98.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | China | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 98.0 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| English | 97.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| British | 97.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |