Czechoslovakian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Guamanian/Chamorro
Single Mother Poverty
Single Mother Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Guamanians/Chamorros
29.7%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
16.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.4%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
31.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 358,570,470 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 29.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,675,506 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579 and weighted average of 29.4%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Guamanian/Chamorro |
| Minimum | 10.8% | 14.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 89.2% | 85.7% |
| Mean | 47.5% | 43.9% |
| Median | 38.1% | 35.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 30.7% | 29.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 61.2% | 55.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 30.4% | 25.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.9% | 23.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.5% | 23.0% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Guamanians/Chamorros by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Haiti (29.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants (29.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Swiss (29.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Malaysian (29.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Belgian (29.7%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Immigrants from Africa (29.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Lebanese (29.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Germany (29.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (29.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Moroccan (29.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
| Yugoslavians | 36.0 /100 | #186 | Fair 29.4% |
| Lebanese | 32.5 /100 | #187 | Fair 29.4% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 31.8 /100 | #188 | Fair 29.4% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 31.6 /100 | #189 | Fair 29.4% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 30.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 29.5% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 29.2 /100 | #191 | Fair 29.5% |
| Moroccans | 28.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 29.5% |
| Basques | 28.3 /100 | #193 | Fair 29.5% |
| Icelanders | 26.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 29.5% |
| Slavs | 24.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 29.6% |
| Spanish American Indians | 23.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 29.6% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 22.0 /100 | #197 | Fair 29.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 21.7 /100 | #198 | Fair 29.6% |
| Cubans | 20.8 /100 | #199 | Fair 29.6% |
| Panamanians | 20.0 /100 | #200 | Fair 29.6% |
| Belgians | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 29.7% |
| Malaysians | 17.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 29.7% |
| Swiss | 17.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 29.7% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 16.6 /100 | #204 | Poor 29.7% |
| Czechoslovakians | 16.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 29.7% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 15.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 29.7% |