Crow vs Pima Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Crow
Pima
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Crow
Pima
22.7%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.3%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Pima Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,005,346 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.431 and weighted average of 22.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,428,748 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 25.3%, a difference of 11.5%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Crow | Pima |
| Minimum | 7.1% | 5.6% |
| Maximum | 84.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 77.6% | 94.4% |
| Mean | 31.4% | 39.8% |
| Median | 22.7% | 35.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.2% | 19.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.1% | 50.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 32.9% | 31.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.6% | 26.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.2% | 26.0% |
Demographics Similar to Crow and Pima by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Houma (22.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Yuman (22.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Sioux (23.0%, a difference of 1.2%), Pueblo (22.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and Navajo (23.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Tohono O'odham (24.7%, a difference of 2.2%), Lumbee (26.3%, a difference of 3.9%), Puerto Rican (26.3%, a difference of 3.9%), Yup'ik (24.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and Hopi (23.7%, a difference of 6.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 26.3% |