Creek vs Zimbabwean Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Creek
Zimbabwean
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Comparison
Creek
Zimbabweans
24.2%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
21.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Zimbabwean Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,646,944 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411 and weighted average of 24.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,868,173 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 18.6%.
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 8.5% | 0.87% |
| Maximum | 69.0% | 43.9% |
| Range | 60.4% | 43.0% |
| Mean | 28.0% | 17.3% |
| Median | 25.1% | 18.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.7% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.3% | 23.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.0% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.9% | 10.3% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Creek by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (24.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Black/African American (24.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Alsatian (24.4%, a difference of 0.67%), Osage (24.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and Chickasaw (24.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 24.6% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Spain (20.4%, a difference of 0.020%), German (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), European (20.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Czech (20.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Latvia (20.4%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 29.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 20.3% |
| Moroccans | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 20.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 24.4 /100 | #192 | Fair 20.4% |
| Nigerians | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 20.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 23.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 20.4% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 23.0 /100 | #195 | Fair 20.4% |
| Czechs | 22.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 20.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 21.0 /100 | #197 | Fair 20.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 20.7 /100 | #198 | Fair 20.4% |
| Germans | 20.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 20.4% |
| Europeans | 19.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 20.4% |
| Mexicans | 18.3 /100 | #201 | Poor 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 17.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 17.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 20.5% |