Costa Rican vs Palestinian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Palestinian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Palestinians
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
91.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Palestinian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,586,429 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,628,863 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 5.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Palestinian |
Minimum | 0.54% | 0.73% |
Maximum | 27.6% | 15.1% |
Range | 27.0% | 14.3% |
Mean | 6.0% | 5.3% |
Median | 5.0% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 6.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Paraguayan (5.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Hawaiian (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Sierra Leonean (5.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.65%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 51.3 /100 | #172 | Average 5.2% |
Alsatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from Pakistan (4.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (4.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (4.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Puget Sound Salish (4.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Egyptian (4.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Indians (Asian) | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 93.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Jordanians | 93.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Romanians | 92.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 92.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 92.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Egyptians | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Palestinians | 91.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 90.7 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Soviet Union | 90.7 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.5 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.4 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 90.2 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Samoans | 90.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 89.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 4.9% |