Comanche vs Shoshone Poverty
COMPARE
Comanche
Shoshone
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Comanche
Shoshone
15.0%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Shoshone Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,758,867 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.394 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,616,342 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.517 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 2.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Comanche | Shoshone |
Minimum | 6.8% | 5.7% |
Maximum | 44.4% | 31.5% |
Range | 37.6% | 25.8% |
Mean | 18.1% | 17.1% |
Median | 15.9% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.4% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 23.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.6% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Shoshone by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Immigrants from Haiti (15.0%, a difference of 0.12%), West Indian (15.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (15.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Barbados (14.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and Haitian (14.9%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Chickasaw (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.58%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.88%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 14.9% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 15.0% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 15.0% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 15.0% |