Comanche vs Marshallese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Comanche
Marshallese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Comanche
Marshallese
16.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Marshallese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,456,343 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 16.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,469,521 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 2.6%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Comanche | Marshallese |
Minimum | 12.5% | 7.9% |
Maximum | 59.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 46.9% | 92.1% |
Mean | 29.8% | 38.6% |
Median | 27.4% | 23.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.6% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.9% | 73.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.4% | 63.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 33.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 32.3% |
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Marshallese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Seminole (16.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Cherokee (16.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Alaskan Athabascan (16.1%, a difference of 0.52%), Yakama (15.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and Cheyenne (16.1%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.78%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |