Comanche vs Israeli Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Comanche
Israeli
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Comanche
Israelis
25.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Israeli Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,354,794 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.321 and weighted average of 25.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,686,807 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.397 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 28.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Comanche | Israeli |
| Minimum | 7.4% | 5.6% |
| Maximum | 75.2% | 32.2% |
| Range | 67.8% | 26.6% |
| Mean | 34.6% | 16.8% |
| Median | 29.9% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.8% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.1% | 21.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.3% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.0% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 5.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Comanche by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Demographics Similar to Israelis by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Chilean (19.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (19.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (19.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | France | 97.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |