Comanche vs Indonesian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Comanche
Indonesian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Comanche
Indonesians
16.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Indonesian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,749,855 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,639,231 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indonesians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Comanche | Indonesian |
Minimum | 8.4% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 60.0% | 36.2% |
Range | 51.6% | 34.9% |
Mean | 20.0% | 17.1% |
Median | 17.4% | 16.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.3% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.9% | 19.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Indonesians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Spanish American (16.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.1%, a difference of 0.21%), West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Vietnamese (16.1%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indonesians are Blackfeet (16.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (16.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Yaqui (16.4%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Zaire (16.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Latin America (16.4%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 16.4% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 16.4% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |