Comanche vs Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Comanche
Chickasaw
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Comanche
Chickasaw
12.1%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
73.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,585,946 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.025 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,403,073 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.068 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 12.9%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Comanche | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 42.0% | 26.4% |
| Range | 38.7% | 24.4% |
| Mean | 14.7% | 11.9% |
| Median | 11.7% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.6% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 4.4% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Demographics Similar to Comanche by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Immigrants from Albania (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Subsaharan African (12.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Spain (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Uruguayan (12.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Seminole (12.0%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Panamanians | 1.8 /100 | #233 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Iroquois | 1.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 1.3 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 1.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Moroccans | 1.2 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Seminole | 1.1 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 1.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Comanche | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 0.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.9 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Uruguayans | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 0.8 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.7 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Japanese | 0.6 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Ethiopian (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (10.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (10.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Fijian (10.7%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Americans | 78.1 /100 | #148 | Good 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 78.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 77.3 /100 | #150 | Good 10.6% |
| Spanish | 76.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 76.5 /100 | #152 | Good 10.6% |
| Fijians | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 74.9 /100 | #154 | Good 10.7% |
| Chickasaw | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 10.7% |
| Ethiopians | 72.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.9 /100 | #157 | Good 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 71.7 /100 | #158 | Good 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.8 /100 | #159 | Good 10.7% |
| Sudanese | 68.2 /100 | #160 | Good 10.7% |
| Arabs | 65.2 /100 | #161 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 64.8 /100 | #162 | Good 10.8% |