Colville vs Ute Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Colville
Ute
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Colville
Ute
6.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colville vs Ute Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,633,773 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Colville and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,601,048 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 2.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Colville | Ute |
Minimum | 0.42% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 41.7% | 32.8% |
Range | 41.2% | 28.6% |
Mean | 11.2% | 11.0% |
Median | 6.5% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 12.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Colville and Ute by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Barbadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Choctaw (6.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Yaqui (6.3%, a difference of 0.66%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (6.2%, a difference of 0.78%), and Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.80%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Dutch West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Seminole (6.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.39%), Black/African American (6.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and Guyanese (6.5%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Alaska Natives | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |