Colville vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Colville
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Colville
Immigrants from Costa Rica
22.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
25.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colville vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,561,813 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Colville and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.102 and weighted average of 22.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,693,762 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 32.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Colville | Immigrants from Costa Rica |
Minimum | 8.3% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 92.7% | 64.3% |
Range | 84.4% | 60.5% |
Mean | 36.0% | 19.6% |
Median | 28.6% | 15.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.2% | 14.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.0% | 21.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 31.8% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.9% | 13.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.5% | 12.8% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Colville by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Yakama (22.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Cajun (22.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Paiute (22.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Congo (22.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Honduras (22.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Celtic (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Spaniard (17.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Spanish (16.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Aleut (16.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Arabs | 34.5 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |