Chinese vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
10.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,071,275 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.419 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 22.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
Minimum | 3.4% | 5.8% |
Maximum | 25.9% | 62.5% |
Range | 22.5% | 56.7% |
Mean | 10.8% | 13.4% |
Median | 10.4% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 14.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (10.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Taiwan (10.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from India (9.9%, a difference of 5.2%), Filipino (10.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Hungary (12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), New Zealander (12.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |