Chinese vs Alaskan Athabascan Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Alaskan Athabascan
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Alaskan Athabascans
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Alaskan Athabascan Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,419,805 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.708 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 46.6%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 57.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 56.4% | 95.7% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 32.4% |
| Median | 11.1% | 28.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.8% | 42.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 28.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 23.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 22.9% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Cheyenne (16.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Cherokee (16.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Seminole (16.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and Comanche (16.0%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |