Chilean vs Sri Lankan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chilean
Sri Lankan
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chileans
Sri Lankans
4.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
86.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
72.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Sri Lankan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 255,436,750 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 436,204,277 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 2.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Sri Lankan |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.96% |
Maximum | 14.3% | 36.6% |
Range | 13.2% | 35.6% |
Mean | 5.3% | 6.8% |
Median | 4.8% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Sri Lankans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Guamanian/Chamorro (4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from China (5.0%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Delaware (5.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and Albanian (5.0%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |