Chilean vs South American Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chilean
South American
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chileans
South Americans
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs South American Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,415,237 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.700 and weighted average of 19.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,993,980 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.213 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 0.76%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean | South American |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 9.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 46.7% |
| Range | 98.2% | 37.3% |
| Mean | 25.9% | 20.2% |
| Median | 19.9% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 22.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.4% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.1% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and South Americans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Israeli (19.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (19.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Polish (20.0%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |