Chilean vs Argentinean Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chilean
Argentinean
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chileans
Argentineans
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
89.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Argentinean Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,264,406 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,579,714 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 8.4%, a difference of 1.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Argentinean |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 19.1% | 16.2% |
Range | 18.1% | 14.9% |
Mean | 8.0% | 7.8% |
Median | 7.9% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Argentineans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Sri Lankan (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Hungary (8.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Portuguese (8.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Icelander (8.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (8.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and Puget Sound Salish (8.4%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |