Cheyenne vs South African Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Cheyenne
South African
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Cheyenne
South Africans
26.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
88.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cheyenne vs South African Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,342,731 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244 and weighted average of 26.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,602,695 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.734 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 69.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cheyenne | South African |
Minimum | 15.2% | 4.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 60.5% |
Range | 84.8% | 55.9% |
Mean | 43.8% | 17.6% |
Median | 38.5% | 14.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.3% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.4% | 17.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 39.1% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.8% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.3% | 12.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Cheyenne by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Cheyenne are Crow (26.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Yup'ik (25.8%, a difference of 1.8%), Sioux (25.6%, a difference of 2.7%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and Pueblo (25.2%, a difference of 4.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Native Hawaiian (15.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Czechoslovakian (15.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Vietnam (15.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Armenian (15.5%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |