Cherokee vs Austrian Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Cherokee
Austrian
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Cherokee
Austrians
17.2%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
83.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Austrian Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,649,449 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.433 and weighted average of 17.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,453,770 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.905 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 31.4%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Austrian |
| Minimum | 6.9% | 5.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 93.1% | 94.8% |
| Mean | 26.3% | 29.4% |
| Median | 23.3% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.1% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.5% | 35.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.4% | 20.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 25.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 25.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Ottawa (17.1%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Honduras (17.3%, a difference of 0.48%), African (17.0%, a difference of 0.77%), Yaqui (17.0%, a difference of 0.98%), and Chickasaw (17.0%, a difference of 0.99%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |
Demographics Similar to Austrians by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are Immigrants from Iraq (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), New Zealander (13.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Brazilian (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Chile (13.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Scandinavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.3 /100 | #132 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Serbians | 87.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 13.0% |
| South Africans | 85.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 85.5 /100 | #136 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 13.1% |
| Brazilians | 84.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 13.1% |
| Austrians | 83.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 83.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 13.1% |
| New Zealanders | 83.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.1% |
| Scandinavians | 82.3 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.1% |
| Israelis | 81.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.1% |
| Native Hawaiians | 78.9 /100 | #144 | Good 13.2% |
| Colombians | 77.2 /100 | #145 | Good 13.2% |
| South Americans | 76.9 /100 | #146 | Good 13.2% |