Burmese vs Immigrants from Bolivia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Burmese
Immigrants from Bolivia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Burmese
Immigrants from Bolivia
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Immigrants from Bolivia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,783,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,699,026 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.104 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Immigrants from Bolivia |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 48.2% | 29.9% |
| Range | 46.5% | 27.5% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 10.6% |
| Median | 9.3% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Immigrants from Bolivia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Swedish (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Italian (11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |