Bulgarian vs Maltese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Maltese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Bulgarians
Maltese
11.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Maltese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,544,553 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.773 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,421,821 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.280 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.91%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bulgarian | Maltese |
| Minimum | 0.25% | 0.74% |
| Maximum | 53.6% | 37.5% |
| Range | 53.3% | 36.8% |
| Mean | 9.0% | 10.4% |
| Median | 8.5% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians and Maltese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (11.0%, a difference of 0.89%), Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and Bhutanese (11.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (11.3%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |