Bulgarian vs Creek Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Creek
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Bulgarians
Creek
13.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Creek Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,586,421 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,656,713 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 21.5%, a difference of 62.5%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bulgarian | Creek |
Minimum | 2.6% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 33.3% | 75.0% |
Range | 30.7% | 70.8% |
Mean | 12.5% | 28.7% |
Median | 10.9% | 25.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 19.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 35.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 13.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Bolivian (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Norwegian (13.2%, a difference of 0.53%), Maltese (13.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.3%, a difference of 0.70%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Seminole (21.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Bahamian (21.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.6%, a difference of 0.19%), British West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Ute (21.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.7% |