British West Indian vs Chippewa Poverty
COMPARE
British West Indian
Chippewa
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
British West Indians
Chippewa
15.9%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Chippewa Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,630,673 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,014,776 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.606 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 1.1%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British West Indian | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 0.13% | 8.1% |
| Maximum | 32.9% | 71.1% |
| Range | 32.8% | 63.0% |
| Mean | 13.5% | 24.2% |
| Median | 14.0% | 19.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.8% | 31.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 16.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to British West Indians and Chippewa by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Honduran (15.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Somalia (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Grenada (15.8%, a difference of 0.49%), Cajun (15.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and U.S. Virgin Islander (16.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Cajun (15.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Dutch West Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.39%), Seminole (15.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Choctaw (15.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Grenada (15.8%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 15.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 15.9% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.6% |