British vs Norwegian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
British
Norwegian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
British
Norwegians
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
42.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
63.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Norwegian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,545,848 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,441,916 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 17.3% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 50.0% |
| Range | 82.7% | 46.4% |
| Mean | 44.7% | 24.8% |
| Median | 34.5% | 23.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.2% | 19.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.0% | 29.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 48.8% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 29.4% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.0% | 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to British and Norwegians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.030%), European (21.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |