British vs Native Hawaiian Poverty
COMPARE
British
Native Hawaiian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
British
Native Hawaiians
11.4%
POVERTY
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Native Hawaiian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,938,105 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,880,799 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.364 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | British | Native Hawaiian |
Minimum | 1.5% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 30.7% |
Range | 98.5% | 28.0% |
Mean | 16.2% | 11.9% |
Median | 11.4% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.4% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.4% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.5% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.3% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to British and Native Hawaiians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Romanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Paraguayan (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Australian (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Finnish (11.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Okinawan (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |