British vs Luxembourger Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
British
Luxembourger
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
British
Luxembourgers
9.4%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Luxembourger Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 527,868,961 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.688 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,471,416 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 1.8%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | British | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 2.6% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 44.4% | 11.5% |
Range | 41.8% | 10.2% |
Mean | 12.1% | 7.3% |
Median | 9.6% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 8.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to British and Luxembourgers by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to British are Native Hawaiian (9.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Northern European (9.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Latvian (9.5%, a difference of 0.38%), Finnish (9.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and Czechoslovakian (9.5%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Slovene (9.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Welsh (9.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Thai (9.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Swiss (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Slovaks | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Thais | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Welsh | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Irish | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Italians | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Finns | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.4% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |