Brazilian vs Israeli Family Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Israeli
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Israelis
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
80.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
62.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Israeli Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,153,944 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,674,574 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.511 and weighted average of 8.9%, a difference of 3.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Israeli |
| Minimum | 0.81% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 20.6% | 38.6% |
| Range | 19.8% | 37.2% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 9.3% |
| Median | 7.9% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Israelis by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (8.7%, a difference of 0.94%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Immigrants from Ethiopia (8.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Chile (8.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |