Black/African American vs Spaniard Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Black/African American
Spaniard
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Blacks/African Americans
Spaniards
24.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
24.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Black/African American vs Spaniard Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 546,554,396 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.837 and weighted average of 24.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 434,393,372 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Spaniards and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.419 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 45.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Black/African American | Spaniard |
Minimum | 12.6% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 65.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 53.1% | 94.7% |
Mean | 28.6% | 34.1% |
Median | 28.6% | 20.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.1% | 18.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.0% | 44.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.9% | 26.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 27.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 27.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Blacks/African Americans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Blacks/African Americans are Menominee (25.0%, a difference of 1.5%), Pueblo (25.2%, a difference of 2.2%), Native/Alaskan (24.0%, a difference of 2.5%), Apache (23.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (23.8%, a difference of 3.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Demographics Similar to Spaniards by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Spaniards are Celtic (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and Spanish (16.9%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
Iraqis | 13.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.4% |