Bermudan vs Immigrants from Thailand Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bermudan
Immigrants from Thailand
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Bermudans
Immigrants from Thailand
9.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
220th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
9.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bermudan vs Immigrants from Thailand Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,709,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.175 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,654,872 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 2.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bermudan | Immigrants from Thailand |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 22.4% | 48.3% |
Range | 20.8% | 46.9% |
Mean | 8.7% | 15.0% |
Median | 9.0% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 11.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Bermudans and Immigrants from Thailand by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Immigrants from Eritrea (9.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Panamanian (9.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Cambodia (9.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Japanese (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and American (9.8%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Malaysian (9.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Alsatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.54%), Osage (9.7%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Micronesia (9.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and Nonimmigrants (9.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 9.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |