Barbadian vs Zimbabwean Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Barbadian
Zimbabwean
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Barbadians
Zimbabweans
6.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Barbadian vs Zimbabwean Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,986,203 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,119,087 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 54.0%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Barbadian | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 0.52% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 15.7% | 6.9% |
| Range | 15.2% | 5.9% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 3.4% |
| Median | 5.5% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 1.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Barbadians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Colville (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Choctaw (6.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Yaqui (6.3%, a difference of 0.62%), Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (6.2%, a difference of 0.83%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.37%), Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |