Barbadian vs Cape Verdean Poverty
COMPARE
Barbadian
Cape Verdean
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Barbadians
Cape Verdeans
14.8%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Barbadian vs Cape Verdean Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,278,644 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,560,730 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.142 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 3.2%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Barbadian | Cape Verdean |
Minimum | 0.88% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 32.5% |
Range | 25.6% | 29.6% |
Mean | 13.7% | 14.2% |
Median | 13.5% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.2% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.5% | 16.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Barbadians and Cape Verdeans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Immigrants from West Indies (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bahamas (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Bangladeshi (14.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and Chickasaw (14.7%, a difference of 0.93%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Cherokee (14.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Liberia (14.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |