Asian vs Immigrants from Ireland Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Asian
Immigrants from Ireland
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Asians
Immigrants from Ireland
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs Immigrants from Ireland Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,137,785 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.309 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,323,145 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 6.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Asian | Immigrants from Ireland |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 38.0% | 61.8% |
Range | 36.7% | 59.9% |
Mean | 11.5% | 13.4% |
Median | 11.4% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 15.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Asians and Immigrants from Ireland by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.67%), Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 0.79%), Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ireland are Bhutanese (12.7%, a difference of 1.0%), Burmese (13.0%, a difference of 1.1%), Okinawan (13.0%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (13.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |