Armenian vs Pennsylvania German Female Poverty
COMPARE
Armenian
Pennsylvania German
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Armenians
Pennsylvania Germans
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
70.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
67.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Pennsylvania German Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,749,032 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,998,353 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.666 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 0.36%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Armenian | Pennsylvania German |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 26.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 24.0% | 96.6% |
| Mean | 12.6% | 19.5% |
| Median | 12.1% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 17.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 21.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 21.5% |
Demographics Similar to Armenians and Pennsylvania Germans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Costa Rican (13.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |