Armenian vs Czechoslovakian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Armenian
Czechoslovakian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Armenians
Czechoslovakians
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
3.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Czechoslovakian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 275,861,464 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,828,483 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 10.9%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Armenian | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 3.3% | 8.6% |
Maximum | 21.2% | 80.0% |
Range | 17.9% | 71.4% |
Mean | 11.3% | 29.8% |
Median | 11.1% | 22.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 18.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 42.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 23.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 18.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 18.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Armenians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from South America (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Chile (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Turkish (12.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Argentineans | 99.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Chileans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Uruguayans | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Armenians | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), British West Indian (13.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Luxembourger (13.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and Belizean (13.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Germany | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 2.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.4% |
Barbadians | 2.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 1.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 1.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 13.5% |