Argentinean vs Armenian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Argentinean
Armenian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Argentineans
Armenians
11.9%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Argentinean vs Armenian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,813,546 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 275,861,464 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Argentinean | Armenian |
| Minimum | 6.0% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 51.8% | 21.2% |
| Range | 45.8% | 17.9% |
| Mean | 14.7% | 11.3% |
| Median | 12.4% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.6% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Argentineans and Armenians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Chilean (11.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Argentina (11.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Uruguayan (11.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Greece (11.9%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from South America (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Chile (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Turkish (12.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Argentineans | 99.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Chileans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Uruguayans | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Armenians | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |