Aleut vs Malaysian Poverty
COMPARE
Aleut
Malaysian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Aleuts
Malaysians
12.5%
POVERTY
33.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
189th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
POVERTY
6.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Malaysian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,776,173 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.330 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,011,043 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 4.8%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Aleut | Malaysian |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.56% |
| Maximum | 46.0% | 34.7% |
| Range | 44.9% | 34.2% |
| Mean | 14.9% | 13.8% |
| Median | 11.1% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.2% | 16.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.0% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Aleuts and Malaysians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Immigrants from South America (12.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Sierra Leonean (12.6%, a difference of 0.19%), South American Indian (12.7%, a difference of 1.2%), Delaware (12.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arab (12.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Ugandan (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (13.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Tsimshian (13.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (12.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Aleuts | 33.2 /100 | #189 | Fair 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South America | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 12.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 31.5 /100 | #191 | Fair 12.6% |
| South American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 12.7% |
| Delaware | 21.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 12.7% |
| Arabs | 21.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 20.9 /100 | #195 | Fair 12.7% |
| Iraqis | 20.8 /100 | #196 | Fair 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 18.7 /100 | #197 | Poor 12.8% |
| Spanish | 18.7 /100 | #198 | Poor 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 17.5 /100 | #199 | Poor 12.8% |
| Spaniards | 16.5 /100 | #200 | Poor 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 16.5 /100 | #201 | Poor 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 15.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 12.8% |
| Hmong | 15.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 14.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 12.9% |
| Tsimshian | 9.2 /100 | #205 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 7.0 /100 | #206 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Panamanians | 6.6 /100 | #207 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ugandans | 6.2 /100 | #208 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Malaysians | 6.1 /100 | #209 | Tragic 13.1% |