Alaska Native vs Fijian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Alaska Native
Fijian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Alaska Natives
Fijians
23.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaska Native vs Fijian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,522,237 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 23.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,892,814 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.239 and weighted average of 23.1%, a difference of 0.97%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaska Native | Fijian |
Minimum | 8.3% | 5.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 63.2% |
Range | 91.7% | 57.6% |
Mean | 32.1% | 28.7% |
Median | 24.2% | 23.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.8% | 20.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.4% | 40.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.6% | 20.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.0% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.8% | 13.3% |
Demographics Similar to Alaska Natives and Fijians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaska Natives are Marshallese (23.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.69%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Hmong (23.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and Central American (23.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |