Afghan vs Samoan Male Poverty
COMPARE
Afghan
Samoan
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Afghans
Samoans
10.9%
MALE POVERTY
71.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Samoan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,780,421 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.137 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,058,260 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.020%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Afghan | Samoan |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 0.57% |
| Maximum | 26.4% | 37.9% |
| Range | 24.7% | 37.3% |
| Mean | 11.1% | 11.5% |
| Median | 10.4% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Afghans and Samoans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Immigrants from Germany (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Syrian (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Basque (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Icelander (11.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and Armenian (11.0%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Germany (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Syrian (10.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Basque (10.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Icelander (11.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and Armenian (11.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |