Afghan vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Afghan
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Afghans
Immigrants from Ethiopia
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,814,784 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.275 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,427,583 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.372 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 2.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Afghan | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 31.3% | 28.7% |
| Range | 27.0% | 28.3% |
| Mean | 13.2% | 12.7% |
| Median | 11.6% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Afghans and Immigrants from Ethiopia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Costa Rican (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |