Afghan vs Guamanian/Chamorro Family Poverty
COMPARE
Afghan
Guamanian/Chamorro
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Afghans
Guamanians/Chamorros
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
63.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
64.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Guamanian/Chamorro Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,686,157 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,737,995 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.865 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 0.18%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Afghan | Guamanian/Chamorro |
| Minimum | 0.91% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 25.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 24.7% | 98.8% |
| Mean | 9.5% | 13.1% |
| Median | 8.4% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 17.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 17.1% |
Demographics Similar to Afghans and Guamanians/Chamorros by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Immigrants from Ethiopia (8.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Israeli (8.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (8.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
| Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
| Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 9.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 49.3 /100 | #175 | Average 9.0% |