Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Health Technologists
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Tulsa

0.0%
10.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1.741329.8%4.1%(+5.66)#164.3%(+5.47)#1,587
2.741378.9%4.1%(+4.79)#264.3%(+4.60)#2,096
3.741148.6%4.1%(+4.52)#314.3%(+4.33)#2,289
4.741056.6%4.1%(+2.52)#554.3%(+2.33)#4,686
5.741035.5%4.1%(+1.38)#884.3%(+1.19)#7,285
6.741045.5%4.1%(+1.36)#914.3%(+1.17)#7,371
7.741315.3%4.1%(+1.20)#1004.3%(+1.01)#7,831
8.741335.3%4.1%(+1.18)#1014.3%(+0.986)#7,908
9.741355.2%4.1%(+1.13)#1044.3%(+0.941)#8,066
10.741205.0%4.1%(+0.926)#1164.3%(+0.736)#8,725
11.741364.8%4.1%(+0.733)#1274.3%(+0.543)#9,340
12.741344.2%4.1%(+0.096)#1554.3%(-0.094)#11,765
13.741194.2%4.1%(+0.079)#1594.3%(-0.111)#11,827
14.741123.9%4.1%(-0.152)#1794.3%(-0.342)#12,808
15.741293.2%4.1%(-0.905)#2634.3%(-1.10)#16,229
16.741452.6%4.1%(-1.48)#3284.3%(-1.67)#18,883
17.741072.5%4.1%(-1.55)#3404.3%(-1.74)#19,199
18.741272.5%4.1%(-1.57)#3424.3%(-1.76)#19,293
19.741082.3%4.1%(-1.81)#3684.3%(-2.00)#20,336
20.741062.2%4.1%(-1.91)#3784.3%(-2.10)#20,795
21.741282.2%4.1%(-1.92)#3804.3%(-2.11)#20,829
22.741162.0%4.1%(-2.06)#3924.3%(-2.25)#21,416
23.741301.9%4.1%(-2.18)#4044.3%(-2.37)#21,898
24.741261.1%4.1%(-2.97)#4804.3%(-3.16)#24,621
25.741151.1%4.1%(-2.97)#4814.3%(-3.16)#24,632
26.741461.0%4.1%(-3.05)#4894.3%(-3.24)#24,878
27.741101.0%4.1%(-3.09)#4914.3%(-3.28)#24,985

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
9.8%
#2
8.9%
#3
8.6%
#4
6.6%
#5
5.5%
#6
5.5%
#7
5.3%
#8
5.3%
#9
5.2%
#10
5.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Tulsa, OK?
74132 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Tulsa, OK with 9.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Tulsa is 4.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Oklahoma is 4.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the United States is 4.3%.