Pima In Labor Force | Age 20-24
COMPARE
Pima
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Pima In Labor Force | Age 20-24
69.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,528,696 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.183 and weighted average of 69.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.10% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pima influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 within an area, or if Pima simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pima by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In terms of in labor force | age 20-24, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from Yemen (68.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Guyanese (69.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Guyana (69.3%, a difference of 0.39%), Menominee (68.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and Tohono O'odham (68.6%, a difference of 0.57%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
Immigrants from Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 70.6% |
Immigrants from Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 70.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 70.3% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 70.0% |
Immigrants from Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 69.7% |
Immigrants from Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 69.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 69.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 69.0% |
Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 68.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 68.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 68.6% |
Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 68.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 68.3% |
Immigrants from Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 67.2% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 66.0% |
Pima In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Data |
Minimum | 0.038% | 17.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 100.0% | 82.9% |
Mean | 36.7% | 70.2% |
Median | 11.8% | 75.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 54.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 77.9% | 81.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 74.4% | 26.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 38.3% | 21.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 37.7% | 21.4% |
Correlation Details
Pima Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.038% | 60,535,995 | 74.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 536,325 | 73.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 224,125 | 76.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.65% | 65,248 | 72.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 52,099 | 87.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 5,078 | 80.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 7,278 | 49.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 3,426 | 92.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 5,836 | 78.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 51,096 | 77.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 1,371 | 71.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.92% | 2,027 | 77.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 1,370 | 24.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.29% | 17,659 | 69.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.28% | 1,270 | 77.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.92% | 387 | 100.0% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.39% | 965 | 76.5% |
[ 68.5% - 69.0% ] 68.98% | 332 | 50.0% |
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.77% | 385 | 100.0% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.80% | 1,835 | 55.6% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.81% | 470 | 81.6% |
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.99% | 2,713 | 35.9% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.26% | 4,538 | 52.0% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.14% | 4,139 | 53.6% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.85% | 615 | 17.1% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.98% | 1,137 | 58.6% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.94% | 806 | 100.0% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 171 | 100.0% |