Yuman vs Creek In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Yuman
Creek
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Yuman
Creek
74.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman vs Creek In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,681,124 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Yuman and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.172 and weighted average of 74.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,449,180 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Creek and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.469 and weighted average of 80.0%, a difference of 7.1%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yuman | Creek |
Minimum | 39.5% | 28.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 60.5% | 71.3% |
Mean | 76.7% | 73.6% |
Median | 78.8% | 78.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 69.3% | 67.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 88.6% | 81.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.3% | 14.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.8% | 14.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.4% | 14.2% |
Demographics Similar to Yuman and Creek by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Pima (74.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Tohono O'odham (74.1%, a difference of 0.83%), Immigrants from Yemen (76.3%, a difference of 2.1%), Crow (76.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and Hopi (77.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Sioux (80.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Menominee (79.7%, a difference of 0.44%), Seminole (80.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Cheyenne (79.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and Houma (79.5%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 79.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 78.9% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 78.1% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 77.9% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 77.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 77.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 77.0% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 77.0% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 76.5% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 76.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 74.8% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 74.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 74.1% |