White/Caucasian vs Slavic In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Slavic
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Slavs
41.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
40.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Slavic In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,396,700 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.905 and weighted average of 41.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,628,141 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.287 and weighted average of 40.4%, a difference of 2.3%.
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
Measurement | White/Caucasian | Slavic |
Minimum | 24.5% | 14.6% |
Maximum | 58.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 34.1% | 85.4% |
Mean | 37.0% | 54.1% |
Median | 35.4% | 45.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 31.4% | 41.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.8% | 74.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 32.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 24.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 24.3% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians and Slavs by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Celtic (41.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Tongan (41.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Liberia (41.5%, a difference of 0.35%), European (41.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and Croatian (41.1%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (40.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Aleut (40.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Lithuanian (40.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Fijian (40.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and British (40.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Immigrants | Liberia | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 41.5% |
Celtics | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 41.3% |
Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 41.3% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 41.2% |
Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 41.1% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 41.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 41.0% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 40.8% |
Icelanders | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 40.8% |
Cree | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 40.8% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 40.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 40.7% |
Immigrants | Laos | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 40.6% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 40.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 40.5% |
British | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 40.5% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Aleuts | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Slavs | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 40.4% |