Ute vs Yuman In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Ute
Yuman
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Ute
Yuman
79.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
74.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Yuman In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,547 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 79.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,681,124 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Yuman and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.172 and weighted average of 74.7%, a difference of 6.3%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Yuman |
Minimum | 5.9% | 39.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 94.1% | 60.5% |
Mean | 69.3% | 76.7% |
Median | 75.8% | 78.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.5% | 69.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 80.5% | 88.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.0% | 19.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.9% | 16.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.6% | 16.4% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Yuman by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Houma (79.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Cheyenne (79.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Menominee (79.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Kiowa (79.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and Yakama (79.0%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Pima (74.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Tohono O'odham (74.1%, a difference of 0.83%), Navajo (73.8%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (76.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and Crow (76.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 79.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 78.9% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 78.1% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 77.9% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 77.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 77.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 77.0% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 77.0% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 76.5% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 76.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 74.8% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 74.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 74.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |